Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:12:08 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        office@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 268652] Qt5:  Some apps fails to start after upgrading to 5.15.8
Message-ID:  <bug-268652-25061-STXvuinTTW@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-268652-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-268652-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268652

--- Comment #53 from Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> ---
(In reply to Dima Panov from comment #52)

stable and releng should keep API/ABI stability.
And more, I'm using the same base both on live system and poudriere.

I've created poudriere jail as below. And when I upgrade base, update poudr=
iere
jail, too. So they should match at least base OS side. And more, currently,
official pkg I've installed is editors/vscode only.

# poudriere jail -c -v stable/13 -a amd64 -j 13amd64 -m src=3D/usr/src
# poudriere ports -c -f none -M /usr/ports -m null
# ln -s /var/db/ports /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options

And every update on base,

# poudriere jail -u -v stable/13 -a amd64 -j 13amd64 -m src=3D/usr/src

This causes massive rebuilds on poudriere when __FreeBSD_version is bumped,
which is overkill except for src/main environment.

As described above, I'm using the same base, same ports tree, and same opti=
ons,
if I read poudriere documents correctly.
The differense is that it's clean-room build or not.

This discussion would be better closed here (stop or move to better place
elsewhere), as this is not Qt5-specific.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-268652-25061-STXvuinTTW>