From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 23 6:58:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2541F37B5B8; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 06:58:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Received: from strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk ([192.168.91.36] ident=exim) by scientia.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1) id 13GLrd-000Phj-00; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 14:32:17 +0100 Received: (from ben) by strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk (Exim 3.15 #1) id 13GLrd-0005Nw-00; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 14:32:17 +0100 Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 14:32:17 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: "Thomas R. Stromberg" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Updating staroffice5 port for 4.1-RELEASE? Message-ID: <20000723143217.V64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <39789037.C7B6B5B7@rtci.com> <397A6352.7D2C1B7E@cup.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <397A6352.7D2C1B7E@cup.hp.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > "Thomas R. Stromberg" wrote: >> >> Does someone plan on upgrading the StarOffice port to 5.2 before the >> 4.1-RELEASE? I think with all of the hype surrounding SO52 it might be a >> good idea to put it in ports, even if it installs pretty cleanly without >> it. > > The ports collection is already labeled, IIRC. The tag can be moved if a change is considered important enough, it appears. I've see this a few times in my cvsup logs: Edit ports/mail/exim/Makefile,v Delete tag RELEASE_4_1_0 -> 1.51 Add tag RELEASE_4_1_0 -> 1.52 Add delta 1.52 2000.07.21.18.09.48 asami etc. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x99392F7D FreeBSD Documentation Project / To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message