From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 17 13:41:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AED31065670 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@chrishedley.com) Received: from atmail-6.bnguk.net (atmail-6.bnguk.net [80.74.253.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574078FC12 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@chrishedley.com) Received: from 77-44-98-139.xdsl.murphx.net ([77.44.98.139] helo=mail.chrishedley.com) by atmail-6.bnguk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MRnhF-0002JZ-Ga for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:41:57 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chrishedley.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87A4605917 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:41:56 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at chrishedley.com Received: from mail.chrishedley.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.chrishedley.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 82SM3bh3OGbf for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:41:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from teapot.cbhnet (teapot.cbhnet [192.168.1.1]) by mail.chrishedley.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6011B605862 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:41:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:41:53 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Hedley X-X-Sender: cbh@teapot.cbhnet To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: ZFS pool corrupted on upgrade of -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:42:00 -0000 On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Chris Hedley wrote: ... snip ... Please ignore this email, everyone: it was my original panicky response that I thought had been eaten by my mail queue and has now been resolved as per the other thread of the same name! Apologies for the confusion (even though it was my ISP's doing <_<) Chris.