From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 00:05:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74538EEB for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 00:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [69.66.77.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9EE52B7D for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 00:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA405sag076313; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:05:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rA405sq9076312; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:05:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:05:54 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: Joe Nosay Subject: Re: CLang version was 3.3 and 3.4 in ports ... Message-ID: <20131104000554.GB46135@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 00:05:56 -0000 --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:57:07PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote: > Since /usr/ports/UPDATING refers to 3.4, will that be added to the /usr/$BASE ? > Also, is it svn ot other to checkout the developmental version of > clang et al && what version are those? I'll probably get most of my > answers researching after I send this mail. > Apologies for any static. Are you referring to the 20131008 entry? I'm pretty sure it is a typo that it mentions "clang > 3.3". The code looks for a clang version of at least 3.3. We do plan to update clang to 3.4 once it's out since that will vastly improve lldb support among other things. 10.0 will certainly ship with 3.3. -- Brooks --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFSduThXY6L6fI4GtQRAmbOAJwPp+w/bRFBaTjkPaq51xCbtYGjbwCgpVoX hf9Em/+pk6hbEtJAG38SLac= =L3lW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--