Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 06:42:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 261333] graphics/qgis: pulls in misc/qt5-doc, but is devel/qt5-qdoc needed instead? Message-ID: <bug-261333-7788-KZ30e5oHOV@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-261333-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-261333-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261333 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@FreeBSD.org> --- Thanks, Martin, for the report. Good question! I seem to remember that qt-doc once had a role for dependents (plugins?). Unfortunately I can't find my records anymore. If memory does not deceive me and doc should be used, however, using qdoc is probably more correct. I have since built and installed QGIS (1) without doc and (2) with qdoc wit= hout doc. I don't notice anything missing at runtime. So I will probably do with= out it completely in the future. Currently I am still trying to get information from QGIS developers if doc/= qdoc should be used for reasons I don't know. One more thought about the dependencies in QGIS: The dependency list in the QGIS port is unfortunately very high. Many of the dependencies are necessary for good functionality of plugins that are usual= ly included. Otherwise such plugins don't work without giving the user concrete hints about the causes. I am considering whether and in what form such dependencies can be included only optionally. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261333-7788-KZ30e5oHOV>