From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug  6 01:14:49 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA04309
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 01:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from voltimand.csd.wwwi.com (voltimand.csd.wwwi.com [199.1.92.12])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA04304
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 01:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cornelius.csd.wwwi.com (cornelius.csd.wwwi.com [199.1.92.20]) by voltimand.csd.wwwi.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA27815; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 01:13:25 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199608060813.BAA27815@voltimand.csd.wwwi.com>
X-Sender: jdw@pop.wwwi.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1996 01:14:25 -0700
To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@HeadCandy.com>
From: "Jeffrey D. Wheelhouse" <jdw@wwwi.com>
Subject: Re: Patch to recognize AMD 5x86 cpus 
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 09:20 PM 8/5/96 -0700, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote:
>Furthermore, the Cyrix 6x86 is just a souped-up Pentium, in spite of
>what their marketing department wants to call it.  If there is only an
>I686_CPU target in the kernel, I would expect that not to run on a
>Cyrix 6x86.

Is I686_CPU valid/useful in 2.1.5?

Later,
Jeff