From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jan 5 13:58:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA18262 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 13:58:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA18251 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 13:58:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@panda.hilink.com.au) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA00771; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 08:57:55 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 08:57:54 +1100 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: Johnathan Raymond Sconiers II cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [fbsd-isp] Designing for a very large isp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Johnathan Raymond Sconiers II wrote: > **NT** **ftp** **smtp** **cluster** > **WWW** **POP3** **DNS1***** > **DNS2** Will you be multi-homed? If not, you really should not act as your own DNS secondary. You should arrange with another (remote) ISP to swap secondary services. Danny