Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:05:50 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        andy@siliconlandmark.com
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Review/Test: Pseudo-device unit number management patch
Message-ID:  <20040219.080550.79264640.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040219025604.D76134@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
References:  <39796.1077013415@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040218.063204.74403147.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040219025604.D76134@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

In message: <20040219025604.D76134@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
            Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> writes:
: The likes of ATA disks include serial numbers in words 10-19. These could
: be used to positively identify a drive when its availability has come
: into question. From what I recall, CF cards use an ATA-like command set.
: Wouldn't it be possible to get the serial number and model from them for
: positive identification?

Not when I tried it a few years ago.  The serial numbers were all 0 at
the time (at least on the brands of parts I was messing with).  Things
may have changed since then.  And that's not a property of the
controller, but the disk connected to the controller, which starts to
get messy from a layering point of view.  Besides, you'd have to keep
a history around for a 'while' of what the unique key was, and that
has other issues if you are inserting lots of different CF into a
machine (say to create bootable CF for production).

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040219.080550.79264640.imp>