From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Aug 3 11:37:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-hardware Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA28973 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 3 Aug 1996 11:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.177]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA28966; Sat, 3 Aug 1996 11:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA00216; Sat, 3 Aug 1996 20:37:40 +0200 (MET DST) To: Randy Terbush cc: hardware@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Mapped geometry vs. Actual In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 03 Aug 1996 11:13:19 CDT." <199608031613.LAA05555@sierra.zyzzyva.com> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 1996 20:37:39 +0200 Message-ID: <214.839097459@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199608031613.LAA05555@sierra.zyzzyva.com>, Randy Terbush writes: >I've long been an advocate of working out the true geometry >issues when setting up SCSI drives. > >Could someone comment on whether this is still (ever) considered >to be worth the frustration? Don't bother. There is too many cpus doing too much secondguessing between you and the head assembly for you to have any pay-back from the rather complex job we're talking about. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.