Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:18:07 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ru@FreeBSD.org: install32] Message-ID: <20051207231807.GC29443@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <200512070915.47287.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20051207084939.GE63887@ip.net.ua> <84dead720512070140v2d777572y6579decf3697fa9d@mail.gmail.com> <200512070915.47287.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 09:15:45AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 07 December 2005 04:40 am, Joseph Koshy wrote: > > ru> FreeBSD src repository > > ru> > > ru> Modified files: > > ru> . Makefile.inc1 > > ru> share/mk bsd.lib.mk bsd.prog.mk > > > > ru> Add the NO_INCS knob to bsd.prog.mk and bsd.lib.mk to not include > > ru> bsd.incs.mk, and use it when installing 32-bit compat libraries > > ru> on amd64. This causes it to *not* overwrite native headers with > > ru> i386 versions, which was the case with <fenv.h> and <vgl.h>. > > > > ru> This commit fixes a breakage but also raises the following question. > > ru> If we don't install headers, do we need anything except 32-bit rtld > > ru> and shared libraries? Currently, we also install .a libraries, .o > > ru> objects, and some data files. > > > > Why not install all 32 bit stuff under /compat/freebsd-i386/? > > > > We currently use directory /usr/lib32 for 32 bit libraries, > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf32.so.1 for the 32 bit rtld(8) and have no place to > > keep 32-bit headers. > > Maybe put headers in /usr/include32? /usr/include/i386 is where they should go - to be clear what arch they are for. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051207231807.GC29443>