From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 19 13:47:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E4916A4CE for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687A043D1D for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:47:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1JLlkOE015624; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:47:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1JLljRJ015623; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:47:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:47:45 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040219214745.GC15344@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <40306CE7.6080104@mindspring.com> <20040216193108.GE12181@seekingfire.com> <20040217040616.GL12181@seekingfire.com> <20040219143838.GL68388@seekingfire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Back to the Future - 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:47:46 -0000 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:45:33PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > I would like to think we would flip the switch before March 15th, > but we still have a few details to pin down. For one, someone > just totally reformatted /usr/src/Makefile.inc1, so I need to > adjust my installworld_*k scripts to make sure they work right > for either format. And for two, I'd like to pin down the problem > with dhclient. This suggests that we better do it sooner rather than later. > Well, more seriously, I would prefer a weekday because so many > other changes get tossed in on weekends, and we obviously have > to make this change sometime SOON if we're going to have it in > before 5.3-release. Yes. You want to give porters a chance to fix port breakages because of this. Next week sounds fine to me.... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net