Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 23:18:48 -0600 From: Mike Meyer <mwm-dated-1044335929.db5a91@mired.org> To: "Thaddeus J. Quintin" <quintin@ohio.edu> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: A question asked many times- Message-ID: <15928.46520.970987.368167@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <000001c2c81a$546e60e0$0200a8c0@tjqathlonpc> References: <000001c2c81a$546e60e0$0200a8c0@tjqathlonpc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In <000001c2c81a$546e60e0$0200a8c0@tjqathlonpc>, Thaddeus J. Quintin <quintin@ohio.edu> typed: > I would like to map my "alt" keys to be "meta" keys. Is there any > reason why I shouldn't do that? Is there a better/different solution? > Using ESC just doesn't cut it... You're using Emacs, right? If so, have you tried using the alt keys as meta keys? Here, in Xemacs, they work as a meta key out of the box. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15928.46520.970987.368167>