Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:40:53 -0500
From:      Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>
To:        Tony Johnson <gjohnson@gs.verio.net>
Cc:        "'current@freebsd.org'" <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: nic cards
Message-ID:  <20000717124053.D48019@holly.calldei.com>
In-Reply-To: <01BFEFE7.C21FC8D0.gjohnson@gs.verio.net>
References:  <01BFEFE7.C21FC8D0.gjohnson@gs.verio.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, July 17, 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
> One thing that I just noticed on the python mailing list is a portable way 
> of retrieving an ip addy.  Why not start using eth0 (unfortunately as they 
> do in Linuxland) eth1 ... For nic cards instead of fxp0 for an intel, 
> etc...
> 
> The fxp0 way is too hardware and implementation dependant.

   ``eth0'' is no more portable than ``fxp0''.  Just because
Linux does it doesn't mean it's standard or portable.

-- 
|Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com>
|MIPS:  Meaningless Indicator of Processor Speed.
`------------------------------------------------


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000717124053.D48019>