From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 4 22:25:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C928817; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 22:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6F59FC; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 22:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA4MOpDK018132; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 02:24:51 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 01:24:51 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= Subject: Re: svn commit: r274095 - head/release In-Reply-To: <86zjc6ab03.fsf@nine.des.no> Message-ID: References: <201411041724.sA4HOEGD098532@svn.freebsd.org> <5459340D.2030605@FreeBSD.org> <86zjc6ab03.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 05 Nov 2014 02:25:04 +0400 (MSK) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Glen Barber , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Jung-uk Kim X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:25:35 -0000 On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > Maybe then we could distinguish file system type given to makefs(8) and apply > > different check/sed rules depending on it? > > More work, more complexity, more opportunity for error, for - let's be > honest here - absolutely no gain. I do see your point, Dag-Erling, and honestly have no real counter-arguments ;) Well, so be it. (another sidenote: it's quite an example of "be permissive on input, and restrictive on output" principle) -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------