Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 16:43:56 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: Juan Manuel Palacios <jmpalacios@gmail.com> Cc: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postgresql 16 Message-ID: <865xnze9mr.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <3614A2E8-4BE5-4285-B9B3-6349235D41C2@gmail.com> (Juan Manuel Palacios's message of "Tue, 3 Dec 2024 13:36:07 -0500") References: <6cKxpppDaTNpexhV@aceecat.org> <abc9e458-9305-40b0-bc58-ec1dd3d636dc@fechner.net> <3bc92b40-205f-4da1-ab9c-d3ae5bb5ab1a@netfence.it> <3614A2E8-4BE5-4285-B9B3-6349235D41C2@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Juan Manuel Palacios <jmpalacios@gmail.com> writes: > Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> writes: > > Maybe the OP is using 2024Q4 port tree? > > PostgreSQL updates are often not MFH (even for security fixes). > Right, the fresh ports.org age for PostgreSQL 16 clearly shows that > the port is still at 16.4 for the quarterly branch, 16.6 was merged to quarterly on Monday, just give the builders a little time to catch up. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?865xnze9mr.fsf>