Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 20:30:05 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>, Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel printf %i? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007182022070.1249-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20000717024029.A24382@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> [000717 01:56] wrote: > > Thus spake Alfred Perlstein (bright@wintelcom.net): > > > > > > What ANSI standard covers _kernel_ printf()? > > > POLA POLA POLA POLA POLA POLA POLA POLA POLA POLA POLA POLA POLA > > > > POLA is a good argument. I was VERY surprised about having to use %d. > > I'm a '%d man' but I had just been reading some C books and all the > code was using %i, I was suprised when it didn't work. You've been reading the wrong books :-). The C99 draft (version n869.txt) has 19 lines in examples that use plain %d, and 0 lines in examples that use plain %i. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007182022070.1249-100000>