Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:29:40 GMT From: "Richard Grevis" <rgrevis@hotmail.com> To: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, ark@eltex.ru Cc: oppermann@pipeline.ch, easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu, kev@lab321.ru, mike@smith.net.au, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, ipfilter@postbox.anu.edu.au Subject: Re: Packet/traffic shapper ? Message-ID: <19980921132940.10044.qmail@hotmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You said: > ----Original Message Follows----> From: ark@eltex.ru nuqneH, > It is the fact it is not flexible enough that disturbs me. > I definitely do not like the idea of patching every interface > driver. Being interested in a bandwidth limiter and observing this dialog, I am still no closer at all to understanding the specific technical reasons why you don't like it. Is the code too obtuse to review? Does it plug in in unsafe ways (e.g. resource depletion problems)? Is there a likely effect on other streams drivers? By every interface driver, do you mean pipes, SCSI etc? Please explain, best regards, Richard ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980921132940.10044.qmail>