From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Apr 20 14:28:12 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA10593 for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:28:12 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA10578 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:27:50 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de with SMTP (5.67b+/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA08577; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 23:27:05 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id XAA19047; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 23:27:00 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA04937; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 23:24:53 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199504202124.XAA04937@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: misc/350: 950412-SNAP: mouse buttons dont always work To: josh@american.com (Josh Littlefield) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 23:24:52 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, josh@american.com, freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199504201553.LAA25997@mozart.american.com> from "Josh Littlefield" at Apr 20, 95 11:53:50 am Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 1083 Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Josh Littlefield wrote: > > > This is totally unrelated. It has been mentioned several times in > > Usenet. It became the ``FAQ of the month'' meanwhile... You need to > > specify > > > > ServerNumLock > > Thanks very much. This was certainly the problem with xterm. And, lo and > behold, the Tk problem _was_ related, since it solved that problem as well. Ok, so i'm closing the bug report. > Sorry to report a known bug. I did check the FAQ, and I even searched the > Usenet archives through the FreeBSD WWW page, but hadn't seen anything. Hmm, it has been discussed in Usenet recently, and it came up several times. I've answered those questions myself a few times, but it's not from my own experience, only from what i've heard. > I don't know the proper mechanism, but this bug should be altered to reference > this workaround as a solution to both problems. Could you please report the bug to the XFree86 people? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)