From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Apr 14 00:42:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA23882
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA23874
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA07947; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
X-Sender: dwhite@localhost
Reply-To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: Stan Brown <stanb@netcom.com>
cc: Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with top port (2.2 STABLE)
In-Reply-To: <199704130354.XAA26242@netcom20.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970414004123.7719Y-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 12 Apr 1997, Stan Brown wrote:

> 	Top compiled from the ports collection produces about 2/3 of a screen
> 	of somewhat garble output, and the dies with a segmentation fault.
> 
> 	It compiled fine. What can I do to fix this?

Did you make install it?  If you got the port, it should appear OK.  The
garbled output usually results from a miscue between top and the current
kernel structures.  You have to rebuilt it on every upgrade.

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major