From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jul 14 15:44:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA19128 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 15:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19108; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 15:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gid.co.uk (uucp@localhost) by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.8.4/8.8.4) with UUCP id XAA12178; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 23:28:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from [194.32.164.2] by seagoon.gid.co.uk; Mon, 14 Jul 1997 23:30:30 +0100 X-Sender: rb@194.32.164.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199707142113.PAA01080@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com> References: Your message of "Mon, 14 Jul 1997 21:38:11 BST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 23:26:41 +0100 To: Steve Passe From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: interrupt latency Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 22:13 +0100 14/7/97, Steve Passe wrote: [...] >> A digital output port and an oscilloscope, logic analyser or something >> similar. Any other (ie non-hardware) method is just inviting confusion. [...] >... and the 4th >CPU could service the real INTs almost as fast as they occur. ^^^^^^ |||||| As I was saying... :-) -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK