Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 04:36:43 +0200 From: Iani Brankov <ian@bulinfo.net> To: hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Subject: Re: The stack size for a process? Message-ID: <3883D1BB.391C9F0C@bulinfo.net> References: <200001180055.TAA17507@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > after making world of a CURRENT cvsupped yesterday, one of my > > applications stopped working because of a Segmentation fault. > > > > The C procedure where the problem pops has about 64k local variables. > > here's the assembly output of the procedure's beginning: > > > > 0x805bb60 <transaction_read_objects>: pushl %ebp > > 0x805bb61 <transaction_read_objects+1>: movl %esp,%ebp > > 0x805bb63 <transaction_read_objects+3>: subl $0x1000c,%esp > > 0x805bb69 <transaction_read_objects+9>: pushl %edi > > > > > > The Segmentation fault happens when the process tries to push %edi in > > the stack, which has been just decreased by 0x1000c. > > Are you using threads? > Yes, it does. Do all the threads in a process use the same stack segment in some way? --iani To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3883D1BB.391C9F0C>