From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jun 13 19:48:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.22.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB56737B431; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 19:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g5E2mRtp096308; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:48:27 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20020614022304.94570.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> References: <20020614022304.94570.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:48:26 -0400 To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira , FreeBSD-arch@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Adding SO_NOSIGPIPE to -STABLE/-CURRENT Cc: msmith@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:22 PM -0300 6/13/02, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > Similar options can be found in: > > - Darwin - SOF_NOSIGPIPE > - Linux - MSG_NOSIGNAL > - Solaris - Don't recall > - Possibly others After a very quick check of include files on solaris, nothing obvious jumps out at me... How is the proposed SO_NOSIGPIPE different from SOF_NOSIGPIPE or MSG_NOSIGNAL? If the behavior is meant to be exact the same as one of those, then should we pick the same name? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message