From owner-freebsd-net Thu Aug 2 7:55:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD6A37B407 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 07:55:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f72Eson49865; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:54:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:54:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200108021454.f72Eson49865@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: itojun@iijlab.net Cc: tech-net@netbsd.org, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getaddrinfo() and PF_LOCAL In-Reply-To: <14756.996751466@itojun.org> References: <200108020624.CAA16288@Twig.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> <14756.996751466@itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < so if you want it - get the POSIX guys to document getaddrinfo/ > getnameinfo behavior for PF_LOCAL, exactly and explicitly. Note that it is far too late in the current POSIX.1 review cycle to make such normative changes, so any redefinition of this interface will require at the very least an interpretation against the new standard (after it comes out late this year), and quite possibly an amendment if the interpretation request comes back unfavorably. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message