From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 29 19:29:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2757716A420 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:29:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike503@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840D743D9E for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:29:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike503@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so2384178wra for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:29:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=I6ZyhR5QSzxxJq98UtimOafopoZKgiL0FzD1jSC45o/ijTQA9DvdjvwPFNLiaUEbJkK3qiX8nR7vzYJScAPE1mCk7FpD0dsnZrtbLSg0dNlHuM0fuVrtkK9sniKNAVPbndfE+LBg21PLefPvWV3hK+8DP9w/ANRixVle/WgUflo= Received: by 10.54.93.10 with SMTP id q10mr10404751wrb; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:29:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.77.2 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:29:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:29:38 -0800 From: mike To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <438C5F80.8050800@citi.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <438C5F80.8050800@citi.umich.edu> Subject: Re: Possible way to distribute NFS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:29:56 -0000 I did find that. But isn't that really paired with NFSv4? That's how I got into all the NFSv4 information about it's future plans for clustering/redundancy/whatever was when I Googled for that. Do you have some specific URLs that might help? Is this production-ready/usable, or just something to talk about over coffee? On 11/29/05, Chuck Lever wrote: > mike- > > you want pNFS. this is something that is currently being worked out by > the IETF, various NFS vendors, and members of the open source community. > google for pNFS or Parallel NFS.