Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 14:44:29 -0800 From: Brent Kearney <brent@kearneys.ca> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Internal vs External DNS (2 nameds) Message-ID: <19991202144429.A86312@kearneys.ca> In-Reply-To: <19991202123650.C5160@hades.hell.gr>; from charon@hades.hell.gr on Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:36:50PM %2B0200 References: <19991201225936.B10261@amethyst.hypostasis.com> <19991202123650.C5160@hades.hell.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:36:50PM +0200, d e a t h wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 10:59:36PM +1300, Kit wrote: > > Hi > > I am wanting to run separte DNS for internal and external networks > > I have a gateway running 3.3-STABLE and bind 8.1.2 > > I am considering running 2 copies of named on the one machine to > > listen on different interfaces and supply DNS info to differing > > Good enough. Take care in the configuration files of the two named's Kit: you should really upgrade to a newer version of BIND - there are lots of exploits available for your old version. If you're running -STABLE, then it should be easy to upgrade after CVSup'ing your ports tree. List at large: can't BIND do both his internal and external networks? (i.e., run one copy of BIND for both networks). If so, would the information about his internal network still be private, or by adding it to his DNS would he be divulging this information? -Brent To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991202144429.A86312>