Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 14:44:29 -0800 From: Brent Kearney <brent@kearneys.ca> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Internal vs External DNS (2 nameds) Message-ID: <19991202144429.A86312@kearneys.ca> In-Reply-To: <19991202123650.C5160@hades.hell.gr>; from charon@hades.hell.gr on Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:36:50PM %2B0200 References: <19991201225936.B10261@amethyst.hypostasis.com> <19991202123650.C5160@hades.hell.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 12:36:50PM +0200, d e a t h wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 10:59:36PM +1300, Kit wrote: > > Hi > > I am wanting to run separte DNS for internal and external networks > > I have a gateway running 3.3-STABLE and bind 8.1.2 > > I am considering running 2 copies of named on the one machine to=20 > > listen on different interfaces and supply DNS info to differing=20 >=20 > Good enough. Take care in the configuration files of the two named's Kit: you should really upgrade to a newer version of BIND - there are lots of exploits available for your old version. If you're running -STABLE, then it should be easy to upgrade after CVSup'ing your ports tree. List at large: can't BIND do both his internal and external networks?=20 (i.e., run one copy of BIND for both networks). If so, would the=20 information about his internal network still be private, or by adding it to his DNS would he be divulging this information? -Brent To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991202144429.A86312>