From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 8 21:15:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B174E16A565; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 21:15:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35B843D53; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 21:15:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b125.otenet.gr [212.205.244.133]) i98LFLoj018867; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 00:15:22 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i98LFImi023729; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 00:15:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i98LFIXd023728; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 00:15:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 00:15:18 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041008211518.GA22965@gothmog.gr> References: <20041008151515.GA3136@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20041008203434.GA2770@cell.sick.ru> <20041008205117.GA7818@gothmog.gr> <20041008205808.GB2947@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041008205808.GB2947@cell.sick.ru> Subject: Re: Calling m_pullup in ether_input X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 21:15:26 -0000 On 2004-10-09 00:58, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:51:17PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > G> Not really. Just trying to see if there _was_ any packet loss first. > G> After running for several hours, the counters are still zero. I think > G> this means the case of dropped packets would be so rare that there's no > G> real reason to worry too much about lost packets. > > G> I'll keep this change in my workstation for a week or so. No signs of > G> dropped packets yet, though. > > It'll be interesting to run this patch on different Ethernet hardware. > On the other thought, if we have a driver that loses packets we probably > should already have a PR filed :) I only have a sis0 and sk0 interface on my workstation. Right now, I'm transferring an ISO image back and forth in an endless between this workstation and a SunFire V210 on the same LAN, to see if any drops are caught with sis0 running in polling mode. Non-polling mode is next and then I can try sk0 during the weekend.