From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 18:41:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2572116A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:41:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BB343D46 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phil.brennan@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so535556rns for ; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:41:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=RFyuxun7+Cv/hrh74pJvAAViVVTQ6l9C6tlRLuiul+9r+dssNeRNwKQZGDeC2xrAMlFtsUHF4AN2zXNHUmgJoMZUZCNpxWxDyHHWlhfSwrym22LbKIrFCB7It6adVDSCg1IvDcx0txZoPI7Z97MrBTXulrBjBMXXzilluUXNY0Q= Received: by 10.38.179.2 with SMTP id b2mr214049rnf; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:41:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.179.65 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:41:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:41:12 +0000 From: Phil Brennan To: Godwin Stewart In-Reply-To: <20050305190443.158c8d26.gstewart@bonivet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050305190443.158c8d26.gstewart@bonivet.net> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: performance under heavy load X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Phil Brennan List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:41:13 -0000 Thats impressive, do you know what spec that machine is? On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:04:43 +0100, Godwin Stewart wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:58:08 -0500, Vlad wrote: > > > to be fair, I should note that as admin / user of few tens of servers > > running both systems, I can assure you that if your linux "loses > > control" with LA ~ 10, then something is seriously wrong with that > > server and it's not because of the linux (rather it's hardware or > > wrong kernel configuration). > > Agreed. > > If you look at the details on http://www.kernel.org, you'll see that the > server is running Linux-2.6 and that the load average is constantly around > 200. > > - -- > G. Stewart - gstewart@bonivet.net > > "I can remember when a good politician had to be 75 percent ability and > 25 percent actor, but I can well see the day when the reverse could be > true." > -- Harry Truman > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFCKfS7K5oiGLo9AcYRArBJAJ4/Cubtab1IShcW2oSLnCJgM7FMVACgmiMs > xt+xdT5ejnZJ5dxJd8SJ4BU= > =Qlqk > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >