From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 18 16:07:21 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DBC106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A378FC18
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:07:21 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
	s=blargle; 
	h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:Content-Type;
	bh=HeZYxLsUSiNnTsz7bvJbVNjgSb+sWnLYbJLJJLiG+1o=; 
	b=oxS41y0/XEMumwvyBR9UUPsuCVVdgjcshksmRzYt2D1quRceUU17ItNmi4deZZk9C0alG5brgFBj0yLHVLsIcpWDZDJoxbGqQmpBIOy3oMKAHPBNksQpIzzuRsSso4Lg;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
	by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <feld@feld.me>)
	id 1SgeU0-00009I-9A; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:07:21 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
	with esmtpa id 1340035630-94480-94479/5/3; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:07:10
	+0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <4FCF9C07.2000607@FreeBSD.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161815550.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<op.wf0i64pg34t2sn@me-pc>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206172212440.2506@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<op.wf3upvdc34t2sn@tech304>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181749160.78762@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:07:10 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-Id: <op.wf3wd8vf34t2sn@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181749160.78762@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD)
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:07:21 -0000

On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:50:37 -0500, Wojciech Puchar  
<wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:

> I don't say clang is just bad, but i prefer real data over hype.

This is the most memorable and impacting set of graphs that I remember. I  
haven't followed the data much since.

http://clang.llvm.org/performance-2008-10-31.html

Now imagine having to rebuild projects constantly during your dev cycle.  
The time savings is going to add up quick.