From owner-freebsd-vuxml@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  8 20:44:40 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-vuxml@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 680A616A4CE; Tue,  8 Mar 2005 20:44:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk
	[212.242.113.79])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AA3D443D2F; Tue,  8 Mar 2005 20:44:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk)
Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000)
	id C9D1D11E17; Tue,  8 Mar 2005 21:44:36 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:44:36 +0100
From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>,
	freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20050308204435.GC786@zaphod.nitro.dk>
References: <310205489.09789@bjut.edu.cn> <1110209378.669.42.camel@spirit>
	<20050307155031.GE3503@lum.celabo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050307155031.GE3503@lum.celabo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Subject: Re: possible wrong date in 4a0b334d-8d8d-11d9-afa0-003048705d5a
X-BeenThere: freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documenting security issues in VuXML <freebsd-vuxml.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-vuxml>,
	<mailto:freebsd-vuxml-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-vuxml>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-vuxml-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-vuxml>,
	<mailto:freebsd-vuxml-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:44:40 -0000


--1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2005.03.07 09:50:32 -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:

> The "discovery" date is actually the date of first public disclosure,
> by the way.  Thus, it seems that 2005-03-02 is probably most accurate.
> However, it isn't really important.  It is just to give people an idea
> of how long they may have been exposed.

Whoops... I always though it was when the issue was first discovered,
i.e. the first date it was mentioned... Oh well :-).

--=20
Simon L. Nielsen

--1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCLg6zh9pcDSc1mlERAtS1AJ9BbvgHf9svs0obpfZ+FMyYZmzMIgCdGI8B
KfUdvugmaNjksWvx4v+gSiY=
=f0uF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc--