From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 4 14:41:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA10316A401 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 14:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from silver.he.iki.fi (helenius.fi [193.64.42.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E3F43D49 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 14:41:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dyn234.helenius.fi [193.64.42.234]) by silver.he.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CED7BC53; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 17:41:19 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4432858F.90701@he.iki.fi> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:41:19 +0300 From: Petri Helenius User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric References: <009301c65418$cc029f30$65fd24c0@Eric><64659004-E643-4044-AAED-076E0CC91977@foolishgames.com><01a901c65493$77ad2740$65fd24c0@Eric><442DC9B6.2090200@paradise.net.nz> <442EAA0A.8030704@he.iki.fi> <442F0E1B.9090505@paradise.net.nz> <027f01c657f4$0d0a66a0$65fd24c0@Eric> In-Reply-To: <027f01c657f4$0d0a66a0$65fd24c0@Eric> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Lucas Holt , freebsd-smp@freebsd.org, Mark Kirkwood Subject: Re: Low perf with smp X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:41:25 -0000 4.x, SMP and performance don't really live in the same box :-) Pete Eric wrote: > Sorry for time to answer, here is result in both case (with/withou > SMP) with freebsd 4.11 : > > kern.timecounter.method: 0 > kern.timecounter.hardware: i8254 > > > If you want I can do new installation with freebsd 6.0 > > Thanks, > > Eric. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Kirkwood" > > To: "Petri Helenius" > Cc: "Eric" ; ; "Lucas Holt" > > Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 1:34 AM > Subject: Re: Low perf with smp > > >> Petri Helenius wrote: >>> Mark Kirkwood wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> As I understand it, when you activate SMP a more accurate, but >>>> slower timecounter is chosen (typically 'i8254' instead of 'TSC' on >>>> intel HW). >>> >>> >>> ACPI-fast should be the default with SMP. It's significantly faster >>> than i8254 >>> >> >> Yeah - if his Dell has ACPI enabled. However, ACPI-fast is still >> slower than say TSC. >> >> Eric, do you want to show us the output of >> >> $ sysctl kern.timecounter >> >> with and without SMP? >> >> Cheers >> >> Mark >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-smp@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >