From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 25 15:28:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B28F106566B for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 15:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380368FC16 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 15:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.248.86] (173.51.214.58) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 25 May 2011 08:28:02 -0700 Message-ID: <4DDD2004.4080503@p6m7g8.com> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 08:28:04 -0700 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Wills References: <4DD47A2B.8070905@mouf.net> <4DD583F0.7030308@p6m7g8.com> <4DDCEDED.9030603@mouf.net> In-Reply-To: <4DDCEDED.9030603@mouf.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ruby 1.9 update patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:28:04 -0000 On 5/25/2011 4:54 AM, Steve Wills wrote: > Thanks for the feedback! > > I was attempting to do some run time testing of this and stumbled upon a > strange issue. It seems that even without my patch (and with it too), if > you do this: > > cd /usr/ports/databases/ruby-bdb > env RUBY_VER=1.9 make install > > on a system without any ruby, it will install Ruby 1.9, then fail to > install the databases/ruby-bdb port since there will not be a "rdoc" > binary installed, but only "rdoc19". My patch doesn't make this worse, > but it doesn't help it either. Should I try to solve this and if so how? There is a pre-existing bug for this. You should fould it in imho. It might be assigned to me. Feel free to take it. IIRC it had a patch, but the patch wasn't quite right or didn't cover all the cases which is why I hadn't got to it -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.