Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Feb 2015 16:59:09 -0600
From:      "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
To:        freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Cc:        kib@freebsd.org
Subject:   Troubles with BIND + r276630  (/r277317 MFC)
Message-ID:  <20150212225909.GB15127@over-yonder.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've been setting up a stable/10 system (currently r278451, ~early
this week), and had some disturbing troubles out of BIND (net/bind910,
but also tested bind99).  Sporadically, on restart, I get errors like


Feb 12 10:42:37 dns named[4071]: dns_master_load: /usr/local/etc/namedb/master/empty.db:1: isc_lex_gettoken() failed: I/O error
Feb 12 10:42:37 dns named[4071]: dns_master_load: /usr/local/etc/namedb/master/empty.db:1: I/O error
Feb 12 10:42:37 dns named[4071]: zone 112.100.in-addr.arpa/IN: loading from master file /usr/local/etc/namedb/master/empty.db failed: I/O error
Feb 12 10:42:37 dns named[4071]: zone 112.100.in-addr.arpa/IN: not loaded due to errors.


and similar.  Nothing wrong with the files, and it's wildly
inconsistent.  Easy to reproduce; just hammering 'service named
restart' while tail -f'ing the messages log will show some startups
going problem-free, while others will get random errors in random
files.  I can also reproduce it on my -CURRENT workstation (r278359,
~late last week), but not on several stable/10 systems of late-Dec
vintage.

In some testing on the -CURRENT box, if I build libc/libthr as of
r276629 and do LD_LIBRARY_PATH hackery (and obviously not the
'service' wrapper) to use them, I can kick the reload without ever
getting troubles (tried at least a hundred times).  Going to 276630,
or using the system libs, it'll happen sporadically (maybe once a
dozen or so on average?).


So far, I haven't seen anything odd in anything but BIND.  I was
running a mid-Jan -CURRENT before this for a couple weeks too, so
there should have been time for Firefox to throw a hissy fit or
something, but no hint of trouble.  So it's not clear whether the
problem is in the libc/libthr changes or in BIND 9.9 and 9.10, but
certainly something between the two is unhappy...


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150212225909.GB15127>