From owner-cvs-all Fri Jan 11 9:50:28 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6CF37B402; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:50:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA18236; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 04:50:15 +1100 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 04:50:52 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Cc: Bruce Evans , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/locale isblank.3 In-Reply-To: <20020111161650.GA55753@madman.nectar.cc> Message-ID: <20020112044623.O3149-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:21:04AM -0800, Bruce Evans wrote: > > bde 2002/01/11 07:21:04 PST > > > > Modified files: > > lib/libc/locale isblank.3 > > Log: > > Removed assertion that isblank() conforms to C90 too. This assertion > > is correct but less than useful. There is some uncertainty about whether > > isblank() is in C99, but it is certainly not in C90. It just conforms > > to C89 because it is a conforming extension. > > Why is there uncertainty? It is in my copy of ISO/IEC 9899:1999: > > 7.4.1.3 The isblank function There is no sign of it in the last free draft that I know of (n869), and ISO didn't send me a free copy of the unfree version :-). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message