From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Thu Nov 21 00:45:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055101C74F3; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47JLSH65Xxz4bMx; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:45:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from John-Baldwins-MacBook-Pro-5.local (ralph.baldwin.cx [66.234.199.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jhb) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA4952330; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:45:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: svn commit: r354900 - head/usr.sbin/jail To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Cc: Warner Losh , src-committers , svn-src-all , svn-src-head References: <201911201654.xAKGsMTv094014@repo.freebsd.org> <59bf120c-2f35-1a22-b6fa-a9c9bb8cfdf4@FreeBSD.org> <991bdc33-516d-6e6d-1880-44930441893d@FreeBSD.org> From: John Baldwin Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=jhb@FreeBSD.org; keydata= mQGiBETQ+XcRBADMFybiq69u+fJRy/0wzqTNS8jFfWaBTs5/OfcV7wWezVmf9sgwn8TW0Dk0 c9MBl0pz+H01dA2ZSGZ5fXlmFIsee1WEzqeJzpiwd/pejPgSzXB9ijbLHZ2/E0jhGBcVy5Yo /Tw5+U/+laeYKu2xb0XPvM0zMNls1ah5OnP9a6Ql6wCgupaoMySb7DXm2LHD1Z9jTsHcAQMD /1jzh2BoHriy/Q2s4KzzjVp/mQO5DSm2z14BvbQRcXU48oAosHA1u3Wrov6LfPY+0U1tG47X 1BGfnQH+rNAaH0livoSBQ0IPI/8WfIW7ub4qV6HYwWKVqkDkqwcpmGNDbz3gfaDht6nsie5Z pcuCcul4M9CW7Md6zzyvktjnbz61BADGDCopfZC4of0Z3Ka0u8Wik6UJOuqShBt1WcFS8ya1 oB4rc4tXfSHyMF63aPUBMxHR5DXeH+EO2edoSwViDMqWk1jTnYza51rbGY+pebLQOVOxAY7k do5Ordl3wklBPMVEPWoZ61SdbcjhHVwaC5zfiskcxj5wwXd2E9qYlBqRg7QeSm9obiBCYWxk d2luIDxqaGJARnJlZUJTRC5vcmc+iGAEExECACAFAkTQ+awCGwMGCwkIBwMCBBUCCAMEFgID AQIeAQIXgAAKCRBy3lIGd+N/BI6RAJ9S97fvbME+3hxzE3JUyUZ6vTewDACdE1stFuSfqMvM jomvZdYxIYyTUpC5Ag0ERND5ghAIAPwsO0B7BL+bz8sLlLoQktGxXwXQfS5cInvL17Dsgnr3 1AKa94j9EnXQyPEj7u0d+LmEe6CGEGDh1OcGFTMVrof2ZzkSy4+FkZwMKJpTiqeaShMh+Goj XlwIMDxyADYvBIg3eN5YdFKaPQpfgSqhT+7El7w+wSZZD8pPQuLAnie5iz9C8iKy4/cMSOrH YUK/tO+Nhw8Jjlw94Ik0T80iEhI2t+XBVjwdfjbq3HrJ0ehqdBwukyeJRYKmbn298KOFQVHO EVbHA4rF/37jzaMadK43FgJ0SAhPPF5l4l89z5oPu0b/+5e2inA3b8J3iGZxywjM+Csq1tqz hltEc7Q+E08AAwUIAL+15XH8bPbjNJdVyg2CMl10JNW2wWg2Q6qdljeaRqeR6zFus7EZTwtX sNzs5bP8y51PSUDJbeiy2RNCNKWFMndM22TZnk3GNG45nQd4OwYK0RZVrikalmJY5Q6m7Z16 4yrZgIXFdKj2t8F+x613/SJW1lIr9/bDp4U9tw0V1g3l2dFtD3p3ZrQ3hpoDtoK70ioIAjjH aIXIAcm3FGZFXy503DOA0KaTWwvOVdYCFLm3zWuSOmrX/GsEc7ovasOWwjPn878qVjbUKWwx Q4QkF4OhUV9zPtf9tDSAZ3x7QSwoKbCoRCZ/xbyTUPyQ1VvNy/mYrBcYlzHodsaqUDjHuW+I SQQYEQIACQUCRND5ggIbDAAKCRBy3lIGd+N/BCO8AJ9j1dWVQWxw/YdTbEyrRKOY8YZNwwCf afMAg8QvmOWnHx3wl8WslCaXaE8= Message-ID: <5d4541f5-fe6c-ecc7-c383-0dfd9596ec0f@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:44:58 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:45:04 -0000 On 11/20/19 3:42 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 20 Nov 2019, at 23:32, John Baldwin wrote: > > Hijacking a side-thread: > > PreS: I think we have way too many of these options and should just > remove 3/4 of them again or someone build a proper matrix documenting > them all and in which case to use in the developers handbook ;-) > >> This one also seems dubious, but in a different way: >> >> usr.bin/Makefile: >> >> # ARM64TODO gprof does not build >> # RISCVTODO gprof does not build >> .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "aarch64" && ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} != "riscv" >> SUBDIR.${MK_TOOLCHAIN}+= gprof >> .endif >> >> Somewhat exacerbated by the whole aarch64 vs arm64 thing and probably >> confusion on when to use CPUARCH vs ARCH. > > This particular case could actually be removed as I thought I made that > at least compile when I was working on s390x: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=351329 > > > You can however find more of these elsewhere: > > ../lib/libc/tests/sys/Makefile:.if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} != "aarch64" && > ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} != "riscv" > ../lib/libcompiler_rt/Makefile.inc:.if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "aarch64" > || ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "riscv" > ../stand/libsa/Makefile:.if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "aarch64" || > ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "riscv" > ../usr.bin/Makefile:.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "aarch64" && > ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} != "riscv" > ../usr.bin/gprof/Makefile:.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "aarch64" && > ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "riscv" && \ The tests comparing MACHINE_CPUARCH against aarch64 are confusing indeed. My understanding is that MACHINE_CPUARCH is arm64 for aarch64? It's kind of hard to guess since arch(7) goes to great length to try to describe these variables but doesn't give a handy table of what they actually are for the various architectures. -- John Baldwin