From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 02:58:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA8416A41F for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:58:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC0C43D46 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:58:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a103.otenet.gr [212.205.215.103]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8D2wCr5015256; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:58:13 +0300 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8D2w9Bo001940; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:58:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D2w8xD001939; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:58:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:58:08 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Joel Dahl Message-ID: <20050913025808.GI1615@flame.pc> References: <1126506523.582.18.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <1126535807.582.90.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <1126552287.2325.20.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20050913024457.GA1615@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1126552287.2325.20.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restructure the Contributors article X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:58:19 -0000 On 2005-09-12 21:11, Joel Dahl wrote: > If you or someone else would like to do the work, and move the donors > gallery somewhere else, for example to www/en/donations/donors.sgml -- > fine by me. If not, then I'll move it the end of the article instead, > since that is a lot better than the current situation. I tend to agree with Gary's initial post that donors should be listed as early as possible, even if this information is outdated. Moving them to the bottom of a huge list of named is effectively the same as removing the list of donors altogether. Nobody's going to scroll down 20 pages of names to see if there are donors listed somewhere in there too...