From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov  6 05:02:17 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB3316A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  6 Nov 2003 05:02:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tcoip.com.br (erato.tco.net.br [200.220.254.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025F343FDD
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  6 Nov 2003 05:02:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dcs@tcoip.com.br)
Received: from tcoip.com.br ([10.0.2.6])
	by mail.tcoip.com.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hA6D21b18340;
	Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:02:01 -0200
Message-ID: <3FAA4649.9010000@tcoip.com.br>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:02:01 -0200
From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pt-br, ja
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
References: <20030930234430.BF3905D07@ptavv.es.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030930234430.BF3905D07@ptavv.es.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>
Subject: Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 13:02:18 -0000

Kevin Oberman wrote:
>=20
> To get to UFS2, you must newfs the partition. I don't know of nay
> other way. The basic improvement in UFS2 is the expansion of many
> fields to 64 bits to allow for much larger structures. While newfs in
> V5.1 and CURRENT defaults to UFS2, there are no problems continuing to
> run UFS1 file systems.

Extended attributes, ACL and MAC do not work well on UFS1. I've tried, a =

decided it was just not worth the pain (particularly since that was=20
rwatson's general feeling about it too).

--=20
Daniel C. Sobral
Ger=EAncia de Opera=E7=F5es
Divis=E3o de Comunica=E7=E3o de Dados
Coordena=E7=E3o de Seguran=E7a
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail:	Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br
	Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br
	dcs@tcoip.com.br