From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Apr 8 07:13:39 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19EC5D29A0 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 07:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.blih.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FGCD34JrPz4VtH; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 07:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1617866012; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=n5mUECMnByJPrvHxKk0uJRYzCXmieVUcRJ6EYtzWN+c=; b=kVt+ffhXYH+CqlJ9EIF5MvExqj93ZEL7Ny7h9C2nH2NDi3eI5FudVGmvQV3xLCZPsQf+xI wSkpQksv+6s/MBFgBr5c9K6Z4BREzn47SWZVIiLsd3MKgEY297rzpO0ducjm61shHzhEq8 WkOHcHPzwvfvEX6OhLaLiFsDlGJd4m0= Received: from amy (j1a01-1-78-205-69-41.fbx.proxad.net [78.205.69.41]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0a6221db (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 8 Apr 2021 07:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:13:31 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: Mark Millard Cc: Mark Millard via freebsd-arm , Emmanuel Vadot Subject: Re: Is it deliberate that sysutils/u-boot-tools is not updated when u-boot-master (and company) progress? Message-Id: <20210408091331.9339d8d8f46549ef170a1bcc@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FGCD34JrPz4VtH X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 07:13:40 -0000 On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 17:38:58 -0700 Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: > sysutils/u-boot-tools is still back at 2020.07 : > > Commit message (Expand) Author Age Files Lines > * Remove # $FreeBSD$ from Makefiles. Mathieu Arnold 34 hours 1 -1/+0 > * u-boot: Update to 2020.07 Emmanuel Vadot 2020-07-08 3 -14/+4 > . . . > > But there have been 2020.10 and 2021.04 updates since then: > > Commit message (Expand) Author Age Files Lines > * sysutils/u-boot-*: Update to 2021.04 Emmanuel Vadot 16 hours 2 -5/+6 > . . . > * sysutils/u-boot-*: Update to 2020.10 Emmanuel Vadot 2020-11-07 3 -4/+35 > . . . > * u-boot: Update to 2020.07 Emmanuel Vadot 2020-07-08 3 -34/+5 > > I'll note that u-boot-master has: > > BUILD_DEPENDS+= gsed:textproc/gsed \ > . . . > mkimage:sysutils/u-boot-tools \ > . . . > > and u-boot-tools has: > > DISTVERSION= 2020.07 > > This may well be just fine, such as if using somewhat older versions > of u-boot-tools has historically been more stable despite version > mismatches. But I figured I'd ask: > > Is the use of the older u-boot-tools deliberate? > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > ( dsl-only.net went > away in early 2018-Mar) Most of the time it's not deliberate as it's just that I forgot this port. This time is was deliberate as some new tools fails to compile and I didn't had time to look deeper for now. -- Emmanuel Vadot