Date: Thu, 1 Jan 1998 15:59:05 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: imdave@mcs.net Cc: hoek@hwcn.org, imdave@mcs.net, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/5393: DOOMSRC port : package Message-ID: <199801012359.PAA16553@bubble.didi.com> In-Reply-To: <199801012113.PAA29660@base486.home.org> (message from Dave Bodenstab on Thu, 1 Jan 1998 15:13:51 -0600 (CST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Hi, Hi. * I got some feedback from someone who (I guess) grabbed it from the * incoming directory, and he had a build problem with the X11 includes. * I've forgotten, but I think that I automatically do a symlink of * /usr/include/X11 --> /usr/X11R6/include on my machine, so I didn't * catch this problem. I fixed this. I see. By the way, I'm recommending people working on ports to not create that link. (We've been bitten by this so many times....) * (I know -- I forgot it's 1998) Do I use send-pr to mention this update? * Do I email someone? Will I get some sort of feedback if the port is * ``accepted''? If there is more feedback, and I need to update it in If you have a committer working closely to you, just mailing that person is fine. If there is no such person (yet), send mail to freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org with the subject line same as this message. When it's committed, you'll at least see a mail saying the PR is closed (maybe more, depending on the committer). * the future, how do I best do that? Id's version is 1.10, so my first * take is that this should be the version number for the package -- is this * reasonable even tho the port is updated over time? Yes. Don't worry too much about micro-updates. We're not in position to manage updates with that kind of granurality. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801012359.PAA16553>