From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 14:41:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F08616A41F for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:41:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roth@droopy.unibe.ch) Received: from mailhub03.unibe.ch (mailhub03.unibe.ch [130.92.9.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F1E43D48 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:41:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roth@droopy.unibe.ch) Received: from localhost (scanhub01-eth0.unibe.ch [130.92.254.65]) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB9D200E9; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:41:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhub03.unibe.ch ([130.92.9.70]) by localhost (scanhub01.unibe.ch [130.92.254.65]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29858-06-57; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:41:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4]) by mailhub03.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id C637C213DE; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:41:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from droopy.unibe.ch (droopy [130.92.64.20]) by asterix.unibe.ch (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8JEfhdB005883; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:41:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from roth@localhost) by droopy.unibe.ch (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id j8JEfhf2021444; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:41:43 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:41:43 +0200 From: Tobias Roth To: "jedihobbes@gmail.com" Message-ID: <20050919144143.GA21226@droopy.unibe.ch> References: <20050919124900.GA19048@droopy.unibe.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Warning! Using Outlook is insecure and promotes virus distribution. Please use a different email client. X-Virus-checked: by University of Berne Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thinkpad T43 strangeness X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:41:54 -0000 On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:00:22PM +0200, jedihobbes@gmail.com wrote: > It's not USB, it's the built in one. No USB related error messages, > USB devices work. Moused fails, because it can't find /dev/psm0. > AFAIK, the touchpad is a PS2 device. Right, I didn't think of that. However, my touchstick thingy works as well, using psm0. From dmesg: psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 The trackpad doesn't work, but I have probably disabled it in the bios, though I am not sure about that. > As a thought, I just read in NOTES that adding "device acpi" is > deprecated, but then if I take "device acpi" out and leave "device > acpi_ibm" then acpi_ibm does NOT load. I have no references to anything acpi related in my kernel config. I have hint.apm.0.disabled="1" acpi_video_load="YES" acpi_ibm_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf > Also, be aware that I have > "hint.acpi.apic.0.disabled="1"" and "hw.psm.synaptics_support="1"" in > loader.conf. I have neither of those. Are you sure the first one is correct? Just remove apic from your kernel config and you should be fine in this matter. Does it work without the synaptics support? I'll try setting hw.psm.synaptics_support="1" once I have time and see if I can get the touchpad working. > One final note, if you look at the bottom of your T43 > under "Type", what does it say? Mine's an 1871-14G, which means no > fingerprint reader, Intel Media Graphics Accelerator 900 instead of > Mobility Radeon X300 and so on. I have a 2688WC2, which has a (useless) fingerprint reader and an X300. > So. Do I remove "device acpi" from my kernconf??? Yes. It will get automatically loaded at boot time. > Will "device > acpi_video" make any difference to the situation? Probably not. I use a patched version of it in order to turn off the screen backlight during suspend. > What would make psm > NOT detect the internal mouse when I have "device acpi" in my > kernconf, as opposed to when acpi is loaded dynamically on boot? I am > SO confused:-P I don't know. Is there anything suspicious being logged during boot? greets, t.