From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Feb 19 13:49:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA7123AAE6 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Mzbk3bdVz46rL; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 01JDnJnL068750; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:49:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 01JDnJR5068749; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:49:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202002191349.01JDnJR5068749@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Return of config files to ^/etc In-Reply-To: To: Kyle Evans Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 05:49:19 -0800 (PST) CC: Will Andrews , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Mzbk3bdVz46rL X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.995,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:49:22 -0000 ... trimmed ... > Indeed- this is just one proposal. rgrimes had other concerns with > leaving installation where it was previously moved to- he was going to > raise this and other concerns here on -arch@, but I reckon he got a > bit busy as well. I'm not opposed to moving the installation into > ^/etc since we can still guarantee it'll get packaged correctly. EBUSY, ietf interim meeting tomarrow, after that I have some cycles. I am not so much opposed to having installs of the files spread out so much, as long as both the old behavior and new behavior BOTH work: cd /usr/src/etc; DESTDIR=/foo/bar make distribution vs what ever it is you have to do today to get a full prestine copy of /etc from base. I support the idea that a module/package should be able to pkg the config files BUTT a "make install" in any of them MUST not smash my etc/ files unless I explicitly enable that some how. I believe that is handled with make conf? I also have a very large desire to see this MFC'ed back to stable/12 so that there are only 12.0 and 12.1 being the odd mans out so support for this intermidiate state can be ended rather quickly. > Thanks, > Kyle Evans -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org