From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 16:41:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D507106564A for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rank1seeker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BDA8FC0C for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbdr11 with SMTP id dr11so1535132wgb.31 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:41:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer; bh=My2L3KcHAC+NpKtmpedoMStIDnBwk5OtVSkBf8cMBtw=; b=E5fbsMrlJZwZ62cy4cJlnfP9IA6B5PfZsbgb3H7mAXRMC0SeIM/PLJskZjFKCwZPUV rdB/tWRC1XkvLrHMu5dBphc5eZK2u11UMSvviGq7H4LFTms61ybHXnV+8V5+F5lx2fCv qp3+QzlbZg8QTpzs/hwzY2QUcP4lqjeqEe9L0= Received: by 10.227.198.19 with SMTP id em19mr7924633wbb.14.1323276104821; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:41:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from DOMYPC ([82.193.208.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ca18sm3651649wib.13.2011.12.07.08.41.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:41:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20111207.164141.027.1@DOMY-PC> From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:41:41 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: References: <20111205.171654.020.1@DOMY-PC> <20111206.170342.731.2@DOMY-PC> X-Mailer: POP Peeper (3.8.1.0) Cc: Subject: Re: CPUTYPE and friends, from 'make.conf' benchmark X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:41:46 -0000 > > Time is SAME as with generic binaries, but score is just a 1.2 = higher,=0D=0A> which is too small to be relevant.=0D=0A> > What do you = think about this?=0D=0A> >=0D=0A> =0D=0A> I think this is why most people = don't bother with setting CPUTYPE ;)=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Chris=0D=0A> = =0D=0A=0D=0ADUH!=0D=0AWhy you didn't told me that right away. instead = making me into "ALL THIS"!=0D=0AYes, yes, very funy! I'll remember = this!=0D=0A:P=0D=0A=0D=0A> As usual, it very well *may* be true, but = please use ministat(1) to=0D=0A> confirm. This requires more than one = test. I'm not trying to be=0D=0A> difficult - but statistics and = benchmarking is non-trivial.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> -- =0D=0A> Eitan = Adler=0D=0A=0D=0AI understand and have read your link about statistics = and benchmarking ...=0D=0AYes, I agree. It is science for = itself.=0D=0A=0D=0AI've never heard for ministat(1) and will throw an eye = on:=0D=0A=0D=0A> A few other good suggestions:=0D=0A> =0D=0A> = http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice=0D=0A> =0D=0A> - Max=0D=0A> = =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AI would like to ask a few questions, regarding setting = up ENVIROMENT for benchmarking, regardless of what will be = benched!=0D=0AThat is, point where benchmarking hasn't even = started!=0D=0A=0D=0AI see it should be SUM (single user mode), with = enabled, only essential "things"=0D=0AShould it be a regular or MD ROOT = based SUM (FreeBSD running in RAM)=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0ADomagoj = Smol=E8i=E6=0D=0A