From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 4 18:54:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C8416A402 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 18:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nataraja@cis.udel.edu) Received: from mail.eecis.udel.edu (louie.udel.edu [128.4.40.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCCA13C44B for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 18:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nataraja@cis.udel.edu) Received: by mail.eecis.udel.edu (Postfix, from userid 62) id C8C482C09; Fri, 4 May 2007 14:54:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on louie.udel.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-22.3 required=4.1 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, LOCAL_AUTH_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 Received: from [128.175.192.45] (roaming-192-45.nss.udel.edu [128.175.192.45]) (Authenticated sender: nataraja@mail.eecis.udel.edu) by mail.eecis.udel.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2012BFB; Fri, 4 May 2007 14:54:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <463B8156.8060708@cis.udel.edu> Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 14:54:14 -0400 From: Preethi Natarajan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Sanitizer: This message has been sanitized! X-Sanitizer-URL: http://mailtools.anomy.net/ X-Sanitizer-Rev: UDEL-ECECIS: Sanitizer.pm, v 1.64 2002/10/22 MIME-Version: 1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Paul D. Amer" Subject: Details on TCP implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 18:54:26 -0000 Hello, I am trying to understand the following details about TCP implementation in FreeBSD (6.1). - The sack.enable sysctl turns on SACK options (RFC2018)? - Does the implementation leverage SACK information for retransmissions (RFC3517)? - Is Appropriate Byte Counting (ABC) available (RFC3465) now/in the future? Thanks a ton! Preethi