From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 18 14:28:48 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621F716A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:28:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F6043D48
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:28:47 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sdrhodus@gmail.com)
Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so245699rnk
        for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 07:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.99.20 with SMTP id w20mr390348rnb;
        Wed, 18 Aug 2004 07:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fe77c96b04081807281c76200@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:28:47 -0400
From: David Rhodus <sdrhodus@gmail.com>
To: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4123603F.2050201@cronyx.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <200408160104.03708.chris@behanna.org>
	<41234FC6.1000005@cronyx.ru><4123603F.2050201@cronyx.ru>
cc: chris@behanna.org
cc: drhodus@machdep.com
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: drhodus@machdep.com
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:28:48 -0000

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:57:19 +0400, Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> wrote:
> I fully agree with you. But this not affect "open source"ness.
> I'd rather call it open development.
> 
> rik

Yes, it does when the public doesn't have direct access to the
development work going on.  Thats what started this thread in the
first place.

-- 
                                            -David
                                            Steven David Rhodus
                                            <drhodus@machdep.com>