From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 03:20:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630DF1065670 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8468FC08 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mAO3K4cs027211 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mAO3K4wA027210; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:20:04 GMT Message-Id: <200811240320.mAO3K4wA027210@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org From: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/129060: [pf] [tun] pf doesn't forget the old tun IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel O'Connor List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:20:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/129060; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Max Laier Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/129060: [pf] [tun] pf doesn't forget the old tun IP Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:34:15 +1030 --nextPart34103142.i1CJtADx0V Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 23 November 2008 11:50:57 Max Laier wrote: > This is a known bug in pppd. You can work around this by using "(tun0:0)" > instead of just "(tun0)" whenever you refer to the interface's address. OK, I've mangled my PF rules, fingers crossed :) What is the actual bug with PPP? =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart34103142.i1CJtADx0V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBJKhm75ZPcIHs/zowRAqApAJ9TymAWVg7czROjD8uoIExiMLYudACfYyZ0 g3HWLxngK+Y1FErYB1gigCs= =c48z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart34103142.i1CJtADx0V--