From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Thu Aug 1 23:08:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438D0A3ECA; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 23:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f48.google.com (mail-io1-f48.google.com [209.85.166.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4605Yz3c3Dz4Mfb; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 23:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f48.google.com with SMTP id k8so148158915iot.1; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:08:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kh2H+s3Zkq4HvHO6bMp5cI4Qm8JptHH3Qzwk5Sj4IXE=; b=mN+YOWOhKdpKRvr2ax5uqFNbVrgO0SnmM18ix2RBgPoMecSpj+zA43iOvV1Dc9+LHG 4rRTzexvCrhVtdkZ8VPsrkLr7b1/KGJZ505Vs6YFW+QYzu1+t7V65JGnNYKgGghE4NXc wd2ijwgRq4G2CFZS2pnobkcvvQq1Z5KY3CUzlGMTPLYEtz2ucIP3V0NKTRtFmJhvBhd3 PFL3mWiKK9gLh1+0AuXdhvLS3GuKZUiUQrkY7zwPYPw9rDM4NAli2Bz0LYyEHH9Lj580 rq4MNbRoXkyre8wh9114GrrKFIB8lrKmdDg5vTWvuW/41XsTvdcFAfiQ9WpWQPZZq/Mk 7Muw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUEEHXVZwLwzRaXG6+tXQVvYWKisftQ85giVTYXChDLRqcjJAWS ficH6ZdU5VQFfNe9zbpPwYB/1SUK6c4t3Yx/Ynk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxHl6hh7qGQnJzAwG5KG3SIL4FL8yfcNUhP8OT8kAbznq0ypuXp5LrBYd1v0OwLoRTifWI5B+pSLsVcJYLmPC8= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:5b01:: with SMTP id v1mr16356725ioh.120.1564700901319; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 16:08:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201908011442.x71Egfa9047254@repo.freebsd.org> <23d23900d06581050562951f5cf6a625235a059f.camel@freebsd.org> <9A3E35C8-7CB9-4E5C-92F4-367715A9909E@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9A3E35C8-7CB9-4E5C-92F4-367715A9909E@gmail.com> From: Ed Maste Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 05:11:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r350505 - in head: contrib/binutils/binutils/doc gnu/usr.bin/binutils/objdump To: Enji Cooper Cc: Ian Lepore , src-committers , svn-src-all , svn-src-head Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4605Yz3c3Dz4Mfb X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.48 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.73 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[48.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.73)[ip: (-7.74), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.40), asn: 15169(-2.46), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[48.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 23:08:24 -0000 On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 18:54, Enji Cooper wrote: > > Thought: could this be modified in an iterative manner, like =E2=80=9Cobj= dump=E2=80=9D -> =E2=80=9Cgobjdump=E2=80=9D / =E2=80=9Cllvm-objdump=E2=80= =9D -> =E2=80=9Cobjdump=E2=80=9D, etc (assuming llvm and gnu objdump are la= rgely compatible)? It could, and we have done that sort of thing in the past. But here we should be retiring the old binutils tools well before 13.0 and I don't think it's worth the extra complexity.