From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Dec 30 14:34:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF7FE87F06 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:34:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp209.alice.it (smtp209.alice.it [82.57.200.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BA77E206 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (79.46.7.203) by smtp209.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 5A323EE80364731B for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:34:24 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vBUEYKlK005333 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:34:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: squid and privoxy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1514555403.55217.1.camel@yandex.com> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <0f74c945-5e32-c29c-c204-48a06dec0eec@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:34:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:34:33 -0000 On 12/29/17 14:57, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Stari Karp wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I have a single desktop computer. I did read about squid and privoxy >> combination how good is for Internet browsing safety. If is true do I >> need both or is just one of them enough. >> > > You don't need either. > Well, Squid+ClamAV *might* help with "safety", if that's what the OP is looking for. Since he talks about Privoxy, I wonder if it's "privacy" he's after. bye av.