From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 25 18:53:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB3616A41C for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 18:53:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9EF43D4C for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 18:53:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 4826 invoked from network); 25 May 2005 18:52:59 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail24.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 May 2005 18:52:59 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1528E2C; Wed, 25 May 2005 14:52:59 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: User Patrice References: <200505250912.j4P9CdJv050852@servidea.dvp.idea> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 25 May 2005 14:52:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200505250912.j4P9CdJv050852@servidea.dvp.idea> Message-ID: <44br6z16k5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: slow download, quick upload X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 18:53:00 -0000 User Patrice writes: > Hello > > answering to myself: > > found that doing a net.inet.tcp.rf1323=0 have multiplied my speed by ten > > net.inet.tcp.rf1323=1 download at 120K/s > net.inet.tcp.rf1323=0 download at 1.5M/s > > i have tried to adjust windows size, but default value are good. > > I still need help to reach a 5M/s rate which is good enough on a 100MbFdx link RFC 1323 extensions shouldn't be able to cause that kind of effect. I'd be suspicious that there's a duplex mismatch on the link; are you getting a lot of collisions?