From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 11:58:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D73A16A4B3 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:58:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F50543F85 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:58:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from damian@sentex.net) Received: from pegmatite.sentex.ca (pegmatite.sentex.ca [192.168.42.92]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8GIwkCk078832 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:58:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from damian@sentex.net) Received: by pegmatite.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 60F4117137; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:58:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:58:44 -0400 From: Damian Gerow To: security@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030916185844.GZ66001@sentex.net> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030916123558.02cfdef0@localhost> <20030916134347.GA30359@madman.celabo.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20030916123558.02cfdef0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030916124550.02a55970@localhost> <20030916185417.GA6885@madman.celabo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030916185417.GA6885@madman.celabo.org> X-GPG-Key-Id: 0xB841F142 X-GPG-Fingerprint: C7C1 E1D1 EC06 7C86 AF7C 57E6 173D 9CF6 B841 F142 X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (lava/20020517) Subject: Re: OpenSSH heads-up X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:58:48 -0000 Thus spake Jacques A. Vidrine (nectar@freebsd.org) [16/09/03 14:55]: > AFAICT, you need not authenticate, it is not specific to protocol > version 2, and there is no workaround. So privsep won't help in this case? I haven't seen any direct mention of it yet, and my understanding of privsep is that it happens before authentication, so it's not clear if it would be a viable workaround or not.