From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 22 17:04:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A8E1065673; Sun, 22 May 2011 17:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ae@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5818150380; Sun, 22 May 2011 17:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DD94232.7060607@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 21:04:50 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh References: <201105152003.p4FK3tnS050889@svn.freebsd.org> <20110522093302.GA2638@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <38A0D352-30A8-47A0-8259-12B3B216401B@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <38A0D352-30A8-47A0-8259-12B3B216401B@bsdimp.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=10C8A17A Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig81A11110392054029A3396E7" Cc: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, Adrian Chadd , Stefan Farfeleder , src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: svn commit: r221972 - head/sys/geom/part X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 17:04:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig81A11110392054029A3396E7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22.05.2011 20:32, Warner Losh wrote: > After carefully reviewing this code, we need to have it be *OFF* by > default. It should also explain *WHY* it is rejecting the partition. Did you reviewed r221992? > It isn't clear to me at all that this is even useful. While > different than Marcel's warnings, I think we need to take a very > cautious approach here. Where was this even talked about before the > fact? It seems like a fairly radical enforcement action to just > spring on people, especially now in light of it having so many false > positives. On the other hand now we know that many users have this problem, and we have time to properly fix it before release :) --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --------------enig81A11110392054029A3396E7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN2UIyAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF6zdQIAMBmrAWAFISkdi/qiw80Wrab YneOxRx+rVJAQdS3RKwJDLftepBS0K9c/zjlDTai3Asx8Oh48A6Pkfy1nMcKOKPm 2/mYos8vFxSMT7PVb7bbe5WW6TPNmE7CcguHGp/StjwAl9HSa7hlfN3ApiLxaFCr EZQ1a1BQzm6CQChk11KpuCsmjdNKOW5wlMVzavP8l0AVejvfIqlV6D1mlJv4DIhH SkbbxKES9y+89CxdSUIl6Y2doAxzM3ri+pjhQMXb20W1/TFaDKJvr1e65y+lgMEA Lf9qEzcOjXU1WQVX6GRbRGT+eOoBe/4SZNPPeZIXvUvYj4AWhJ6RVCLmnuvWWxw= =rC5p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig81A11110392054029A3396E7--